Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to sadra.dev

Sadra Naddaf · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
jamesdvance.com
James Vance, ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
diogodalves.com
Diogo's Resume
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
pmgardias.com
Marek Gardias - pmgardias.com
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
andrewreed.com
Andrew Reed | Applied AI & Machine Learning Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
jalexhurt.com
J. Alex Hurt, PhD
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
andreagiardina.com
Andrea Giardina — Home
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
jaedonml.dev
Jaedon Cox
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
antbear.ai
Welcome | Antbear
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
antonkasyanov.com
Anton Kasyanov
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
oedokumaci.com
Home
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
isaiahmcnealy.com
Isaiah McNealy — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
lydiaychen.com
Lydia Y. Chen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
suryathota.com
Surya Thota - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
plusreinforcement.io
[+] Reinforcement – Machine Learning & Systems Programming
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
eswilliams.dev
Edward Williams
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
gaussic.com
Gaussic
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
rileyjwilliams.com
Riley Williams — ML Scientist
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
ismilelab-telu.com
I-Smile Laboratory
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.