Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to sadam.dev

Sadam | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
samuelkuz.com
Sam | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
santdeleon.io
Sant | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
samholst.com
Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
ken-wu.com
Ken Wu | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
ruamond.dev
RuaMond | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
alecngo.com
Alec Ngo | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
ryandcyeo.com
Ryan Yeo | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
samleyva.com
Sam Leyva | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
ajcodes.dev
AJ Tamayo | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
ryantcave.com
Ryan Cave | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
ryanleys.com
Ryan Leys | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
azuradara.dev
Dara - Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
alaasmagi.dev
Aleksander | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
alan2.com
Alan Jones | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
kengreeff.com
Ken Greeff | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
ryanjameswhite.com
Ryan White | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
2alan.com
Alan Jones | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
ahmetsari.com
Ahmet Sari | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.