Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to russcodes.com

Russ Codes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
nwacodes.com
NWA Codes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
itsjamie.dev
Jamie Murphy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
reviewscode.com
Reviews Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
cajuncodemonkey.com
Cajun Code Monkey
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
essenceofcode.com
Essence of Code – Random Thoughts on Software Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
sharkscodeltd.com
Sharks Code Ltd
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andy-yao.com
Andy Yao | Capital Markets Software Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
computersandpeople.com
Computers & People
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
heiwig.com
Florian G. Heiwig - Product & Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
obedcodes.com
Home | Obed Codes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kobelei.com
Kobe Lei - Software Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
cajuncoding.com
Geaux Code!
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
divisionfieldguide.com
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
dlaisoft.com
homepage
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
itjukebox.com
Russ Jackson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gatheringagility.com
Gathering Agility
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
korthane.com
Korthane
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
dingbotcode.com
Ding Bot Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.