Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rumiloghmani.com

Rumi Loghmani | Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
devinpham.com
Devin Pham | Portfolio
2 shared topicsrobotics
71match
eugegeuge.com
Hugo Sevilla - Robotics & AI Engineer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
patrickjhourican.com
My Portfolio
2 shared topicsrobotics
71match
arpl.dev
ARPL - Pawel Lach Portfolio
2 shared topicsrobotics
71match
pathofseb.com
Sebastian - Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
renewdwell.com
RenewDwell Portfolio | BrandCaviar
2 shared topicsrobotics
70match
agentpersist.com
PersistAgent Portfolio | BrandCaviar
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
abhishekkathpal.com
Abhishek Kathpal – Robotics Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
ashwath.net
Ashwath Karthikeyan Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
abrash.dev
Abrash Official | ML, AI, Robotics Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
pearlabs.dev
Dev Portfolio | Creative Technologist
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
eunoiaengineer.com
István Nagy | Mechatronics Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
andantekim.com
Personal Portfolio Template
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
alexshao.net
Alex Shao
2 shared topicsrobotics
66match
arnav-chopra.com
Arnav Chopra
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
dev-kumar.com
Dev Kumar — Mechatronics & AI Engineer | Robotics, ROS2, Deep Learning
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ashwinjothi.dev
Ashwin Jothi | Robotics & ML Engineer
2 shared topicsrobotics
64match
andywei.dev
Andy Wei
2 shared topicsrobotics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.