Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to rowankeir.com

Author | Rowan Keir · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
sorenfielding.com
Author | Soren Fielding
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
santiagodagon.com
Author | Santiago Dagon
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
amyneswald.com
Author | Amy Neswald
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
alanrowan.com
Alan Rowan, Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ayanasymone.com
Author | Ayana Symone
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ericdolin.com
Author | Eric Jay Dolin
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ericjaydolin.com
Author | Eric Jay Dolin
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
deenalindstedt.com
Author | Deena Lindstedt
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
aaronconaway.com
Author | Aaron Conaway
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
esmeljames.com
Author | Esme Louise James
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
amykeednevada.com
Author | Amy Keed Nevada
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alastairsolano.com
Author Site
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
albanobooks.com
Author Site
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alecivan.com
Author Site
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
sotobooks.com
Author Site
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
sanmanthapa.com
Sanman Thapa | Author | Counselor | Storyteller
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ajlockewrites.com
Author | Author A.J. Locke
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alexanderhelas.com
Alexander Helas | Author | New York
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.