Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rosem.dev

RosemDev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
andywhittle.dev
Andy Whittle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arkham-development.com
Arkhamdev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
guhaniyer.com
Guhan Iyer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nextdoorhacker.com
NextDoorHacker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
fatosmorina.com
Fatos Morina - Personal blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robjdavey.com
RobJDavey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
theswiftdev.com
Articles about application development - The.Swift.Dev.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
thekotlindev.com
The Kotlin Dev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
kuzniatsou.com
Dzmitry Kuzniatsou's env | Speculations about software development, design, architecture, java and more …
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
mathiassm.com
MathiasSM - Software Development Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alchemistcamp.com
Learn Elixir and Phoenix | Alchemist Camp
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
belongstoruby.com
belongs_to :ruby
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
blossomdevs.com
The BlossomDevs
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
nodeahmedabad.com
Homepage | Node Ahmedabad
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pembrokesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pembroke Software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
fandermill.com
Fandermill
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
nilsou.com
iOS Development | Nils Hayat
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
nikossyris.com
Nikos Syris' Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.