Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rootsofshame.com

Training Closed · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
dnhtraining.com
DNH-Training
1 shared topicsmental-health
72match
asbtraining.co.uk 🇬🇧
ASB Training
1 shared topicsmental-health
71match
thementaltrainingcoach.com
The Mental Training Coach
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
newmindtraining.com
NewMind Training
1 shared topicsmental-health
69match
fasdtrainingaustralia.com
FASD Training Australia
1 shared topicsmental-health
68match
mentalhealthtraining.ie 🇮🇪
Mental Health Training Ireland
1 shared topicsmental-health
68match
neurofeedback-denver.com
Neurofeedback Training Company Denver
1 shared topicsmental-health
68match
neurovaleo.com
Neurofeedback Training in Sitges
1 shared topicsmental-health
68match
elucidatetraining.co.uk 🇬🇧
Fasd | Elucidate Training
1 shared topicsmental-health
68match
coachesmentalhealth.com
Mental Health Training for Coaches
1 shared topicsmental-health
67match
thementalhealthtrainingco.com
Mental Health Training.Co
1 shared topicsmental-health
67match
armorcounseling.com
Home - Armor Counseling & Training
1 shared topicsmental-health
67match
therapeutictremor.com
The Resilience Toolkit Training Alliance
1 shared topicsmental-health
66match
angst-manager.com
Jakob Handlechner | Mentaltraining
1 shared topicsmental-health
66match
maudsleylearning.com
Maudsley Learning | Mental Health Training
1 shared topicsmental-health
66match
3catsstudio.com
3 Cats Studio Has Closed
1 shared topicsmental-health
66match
3catstudio.com
3 Cats Studio Has Closed
1 shared topicsmental-health
66match
3catstudios.com
3 Cats Studio Has Closed
1 shared topicsmental-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.