Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rootsinfosoft.com

Roots Infosoft Technology Pvt Ltd · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
matrixtg.com
Matrix Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
sonoya-technology.com
SONOYA TECHNOLOGY
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
theotistech.com
Theotis Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
arkintechno.com
:: ARKIN TECHNO Pvt Ltd ::
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
thetechbuild.com
Home - Technology Builders
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
softbuzztech.com
Softbuzz Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
newdigtech.com
New Digital Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
guildtg.com
Home - Guild Technology Group
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
kyostech.com
Kyos Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
phronesistechnologysolutions.com
Phronesis Technology Solutions
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
internect.com
interNECT - Technology Services
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
newjodabri.com
New Jodabri - Technology Solutions
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
argentis-technologies.com
Argentis Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
kvrinfo.com
Home - SS Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
sstechnologies.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - SS Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
intechindia.com
INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
ipect.com
InfoSpectrum Inc | Technology Solutions & IT Services
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
krishars.com
krishars Excellence of Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.