Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to roofingsw.com

Global Roofing Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
kzu-group.com
KZU Holding Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
roofing-hq.com
Home - Roofing HQ
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
groupglobalcompany.com
Group Global Company
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
roofingsolutionstn.com
Roofing Solutions
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
aldawood.net
Al Dawood Holding Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
pinewoodbuildinggroup.com
Pinewood Building Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
360commercialroofing.com
360 Commercial Roofing | Fueling Growth for the Industry
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
cobaltpl.com
Cobalt Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
3dcontractinggroup.net
Home | 3D Contracting Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
roofa.ai
Scale Your Roofing Business
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
roofpursuit.com
RoofPursuit | Roofing Alerts
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
nfgab.com
Home - Nordic Fastening Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
rojasconsultinggroupcr.com
Rojas Consulting Group - Home
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
roofingsgroup.com
Roofings Group - Strength of A Nation
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
roofingtradeservices.com
Roofing Trade Services
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
cobbletac.com
CTA Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
dmaterials.com
PDH Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
groupembk.com
MBK Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.