Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ronamick.dev

Ron Amick – Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
farzaneh-dev.com
Farzaneh Sadeghi – Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
arijdev.com
Arij – Dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
bmcdonald.dev
Brian McDonald – Developer At Large
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
abdullahaman.com
Abdullah Aman – Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
pjbondad.com
PJ Bondad – Website Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
matanmaimon.com
Matan Boaz Maimon – Developer Websites
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
dmvillar.com
DM Villar – WordPress Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
bhanuprakash.net
Bhanu Prakash – Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
abbez.net
Abbez Network – Freelance Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
pk-developer.com
PK Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
sohaibworks.com
Sohaib Irfan – Designer & Business Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
alans1111.com
Alan Stanford – WordPress Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
aaronfischer.dev
Aaron Fischer – Full Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
somosoft.com
Somosoft – App Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andrius.info
Web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
dobridobrev.com
Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
kstaka.com
Takaaki Kosugi – WordPress Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
matcastell.com
Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.