Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to romankudakov.com

Lighting Designer Roman Kudakov · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
aetherlightingdesign.com
AETHER Lighting Design
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
arkeloradesign.com
ARKÉLORA - Designer Lighting
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
a1lightingdesign.com
A1 Lighting Design & Supply Ltd.
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
masoodahaqq.com
A1 Lighting Design & Supply Ltd.
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
speakingcourses.co.uk 🇬🇧
A1 Lighting Design & Supply Ltd.
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
fangtingid.com
Fangting Design
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
abyulighting.com
Abyu Lighting | Designer Lighting New York
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
1ltg.com
One Source Lighting & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
romankvita.com
Roman Kvita Design
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
mattadesigner.com
Matta Designer |
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
lighttech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Bespoke Lighting Design: Hampshire & UK-Wide | Light Tech
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
piethein.com
Design lighting and exclusive design articles
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
thelumous.com
Sculptural Table Lamps & Artistic Lighting | TheLumous Designer Lamps
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
dmfluxury.com
DMF Luxury Lighting | Designed to Inspire, Built to Perform
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
interiaasia.com
Interia — Discover Interior Designers, Furniture & Lighting Brands
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
arielnorling.com
Ariel Norling – Designer & Writer
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
above90lighting.com
Above 90 Lighting
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
2d-bg.com
2D Design
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.