Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to romankhaves.com

Roman Khaves · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
pilot-waves.com
Pilot Waves | Roman N. Lasker | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
romainlibeau.com
Romain Libeau
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
benjaminschleier.com
Benjamin Schleier
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
theonepersonstartup.com
Home | The One Person Startup
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
theonitstudio.com
The On It Studio | Products, Platforms & Partnerships for Creators
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
pinnyang.com
Pinn Yang
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
societyrebel.com
Society Rebel | Venture Studio
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
arkhamnyc.com
Adrian Kehlmann
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
maxqcenter.com
Max Q Center | Capital Region's Entrepreneurship Center
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
rogerjanik.com
Roger Janik Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
bobtroia.com
Bob Troia - Austin, TX USA, https://isjustawesome.com, Penn State University | about.me
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
roberttroia.com
Bob Troia - Austin, TX USA, https://isjustawesome.com, Penn State University | about.me
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
invespire.com
Home
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
kunalmittal.com
Kunal Mittal — Entrepreneur, Technologist, Winemaker
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
somastartup.com
SOMA Startup — Youth Entrepreneurship in South Orange & Maplewood
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
aimy.org
Aimy Steadman
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
fastlaneforum.com
The Fastlane Entrepreneur Discussion Forum
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
kueic.com
KUEIC - Khalifa University Entrepreneurship & Innovation Club | KUEIC
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.