Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to romankapur.com

Roman Kapur · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
rohankall.com
Rohan Kalluraya | Homepage
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
rohankumar.io
Rohan Kumar
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
arimanjikian.com
Ari Manjikian
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
grimmston.com
Tyler Johnston
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
fatmandesigner.com
Fatman Designer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
abdelrhmansafwat.com
Abdelrhman Safwat
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
rmadisonhaynie.com
R. Madison Haynie
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
bictxt.org
Dr. Gregor Kappler
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
kristiankahkonen.com
Kristian Kähkönen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mateimandache.com
Matei Mandache Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mateusz-nejman.com
Mateusz Nejman | Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
aaryaman.me
Aaryaman | Portfolio OS
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
abdelrahman-elkady.tech
Home | Abdelrahman Elkady
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
abdirahmxn.dev
Abdirahman Ahmed · Product Builder
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
doctorbud.com
Dan Keith (aka DoctorBud) Home Base
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
asknorman.org
Genodians.org: posts of Norman Feske
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
arpankotecha.dev
arpankotecha (Arpan Kotecha) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
armancodes.com
Arman Ahmadi - Backend Engineer | Arman Ahmadi
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.