Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to rolimans.dev

rolimans (Eduardo Amaral) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

jnzd (Jonas) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

GranderStark (Lev) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

nilkoush (Nikolas) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

ousid (Oussama) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

nielsenjack.com

nielsenjack (Jack Nielsen) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

tahaluh (Thauã Magalhães) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

deleonemail.com

CDeLeon94 · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

noijen (BN) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

bjoerge (Bjørge Næss) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

OpenPeeps · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

ALAWI CO · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

lexordev · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jg-lopes · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Nils-Fischer (Nils Fischer) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

orelby (Or'el) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

laralabs.uk 🇬🇧

Laralabs · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

guns (Sung Pae) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

meialau (Meiallu) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.