Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rolanp.com

Rolan Pichler · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
ronpich.com
Ron Pichardo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rolandshum.com
Roland Shum
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mayadetwiller.com
Maya Detwiller – engineer, researcher, writer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewlwatts.com
Andrew L Watts
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
albumbuzz.net
Trolans.net
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pintoverse.com
Ethan Pinto
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
theprotocolmusic.com
Trolans.net
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aidanfogarty.me
Aidan Fogarty
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alecpagliarussi.me
Alec Pagliarussi
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
intuity.io
Intuity
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rolandnemes.com
Roland Nemes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
adrianmiles.io
Adrian Miles - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kristinmayo.com
Welcome | Kristin Mayo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
maunsell.io
James Maunsell — James Maunsell
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
robbiesapunarich.com
Robbie Sapunarich
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexgutierrez.tech
Alex Gutierrez — Software Engineer & Engineering Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andy-roberts.net
Homepage | andy-roberts.net
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dogonthehorizon.com
Fernando Freire - Software engineer, leader, and amateur PLT researcher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.