Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rogersm.com

Roger Sen - Roger Sen's exploring area · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
kzoeps.com
@kzoeps gi zimchu
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kunyilu.com
Kunyi's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
theorutter.com
All posts | Theo Rutter
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
insomniacgeek.com
An Insomniac Geek - Coding Insights & Tech Exploration
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
asksnehasish.com
Snehasish's Ideas | Know what's going on in my mind
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
nicoevergara.com
Nico Vergara
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
roblao.com
A software engineer's blog by Rob Lao
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
fedidat.com
Ben's Corner
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
cloudperformancetest.com
The Performance Engineering Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
alefranz.net
Alessio Franceschelli
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
abiram.me
abiramen's site
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
bellw3ther.tech
Bellwether's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
fasciism.com
fASCIIsm: For the Love of Text
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
robmaes.com
Home - Rob Maes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
alexshepherd.me
Dev Blog | alexshepherd.me
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
intanrafi.com
rafikurnia's blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
iosengineeringpro.com
iOS Engineering Pro
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
kylefredin.com
Kyle Fredin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.