Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rogerarrick.com

RogerArrick.com Roger Arrick Project Repository · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
robotrepository.com
robot repository
1 shared topicsrobotics
68match
robowarner.com
RoboWarner – My projects
1 shared topicsrobotics
67match
robo-lab.org
robo-lab.org | Robotic projects
1 shared topicsrobotics
66match
bluesealproject.com
The Blue Seal Project
1 shared topicsrobotics
66match
robostuff.com
RoboStuff - Robotics news, projects and stuff
1 shared topicsrobotics
65match
robotikprojects.com
Robotik Projects
1 shared topicsrobotics
65match
thematic-learning.com
Welcome to the DEMETER Project - The Demeter Project
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
ajanthastudentsproject.com
Ajantha Students Project - Ajantha Students Project
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
accra-project.org
Home - ACCRA Project
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
robotics4eu.com
Robotics4EU Project
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
pigeonsblue.com
Blue Pigeons – (Projects and ideas from Erin Nolan)
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
robotnanohand.com
Robot Nano Hand - open source robot hand project
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
3srp.com
3Spheres Robotics Project
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
gunthercox.com
Gunther Cox | Open Source, Robotics, and Photobooth Projects
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
matasciuzelis.com
Matas' Project Showcase - Robotics & Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
grigoriifediakov.com
Grigorii's Portfolio
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
robotfox.com
Fox Different - Home of the Foxee Animatronic Robot Project!
1 shared topicsrobotics
63match
andygranados.com
Andy Granados | Bioengineering at UIUC, Essays and Projects
1 shared topicsrobotics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.