Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to roell.dev

Garrett Roell · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
greenwoldlab.com
Matthew Greenwold
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
64match
kumarsaurabhsingh.com
Kumar Saurabh Singh
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
64match
themydlarzlab.com
MYDLARZ LAB - Home
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
63match
farzantaj.com
Farzan Taj
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
63match
agnesdellinger.org
agnesdellinger.org | Agnes Dellinger
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
63match
growelab.com
Home - GROWE Lab
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
63match
fascionelab.com
Fascione Lab | chemical glycobiology
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
63match
favelalab.com
Favela Lab | University of Arizona
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
benjamin-kramer.com
Benjamin Kramer - Computational Biology & Epidemiology Researcher
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
kuanshiongkhoo.com
Kuan Shiong Khoo's Research Group - Algae Bioseparation Research
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
fanmicrobiomelab.com
Fan Lab
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
intjdevbiol.com
The International Journal of Developmental Biology
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
matt-arnold-bio.com
Matt Arnold
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
aj-robertson.com
Alexander Robertson – Science and Photography
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
benjones-math.com
Ben Jones
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
bonitahpowell.com
Bonita H. Powell
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
grotewold-lab.com
Hello! Welcome to the Grotewold Lab website! | Grotewold Lab
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences
62match
phylogenetic.com
Rest Lab
1 shared topicsbiological-sciences

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.