Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to roegler.com

Roegler Retention Consulting · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
mayrabezares.com
Mayra I. Bezares
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising
72match
aroyanconsulting.com
Aroyan Consulting
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising
71match
askcbc.com
CB Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
cmconsultingenterprise.com
CM Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
kwongtooyen.com
KW Consulting
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising
71match
thejwconsulting.com
JW Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
1amconsulting.com
1am Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
kwgreenconsulting.com
KW Green Consulting
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising
71match
fdixconsulting.com
FDix Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
maxhconsulting.com
MAX H CONSULTING
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising
70match
alexstanfordbrown.com
Alex Brown Consulting
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising
70match
cmatxconsulting.com
Cmatx Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
djtalconsulting.com
DJtal Consulting
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising
70match
greenretailconsulting.com
Green Retail Consulting
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising
70match
bmbconsultingbmb.com
BMB CONSULTING OOD
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
favotteconsulting.com
FAVOTTE CONSULTING
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
feendleconsulting.com
Feendle Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
mgconsultinggroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
MG Consulting Group
2 shared topicsmarketing-and-advertising

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.