Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rodmcnew.com

Rod Mcnew - Web Software Engineering · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
faridraka.dev
Farid Raka | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
adilraqioui.tech
Adil Raqioui — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
3lt.dev
3LT — Software Engineering Studio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
matiasrotondo.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
pimmey.com
Yegor Borisenco – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
rlchandani.com
Rohit Chandani | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
sokuranton.dev
Anton Sokur - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
matthewgoodson.com
Matthew Goodson - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
dnuge.dev
Daniel Nugent | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abhisheksharma.me
Abhishek Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
nguyennd.com
Duy Nguyen | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
sonangga.dev
Angga Maulana | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
adamgrady.dev
Adam Grady | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rjcodes.dev
Lee Ren Jie | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abdulghani.tech
Abdul Ghani - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
bhaumicsingh.dev
Bhaumic Singh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
faridvatani.com
Farid Vatani | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.