similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to roddavisauthor.com

Rod Davis · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

AJ DAVIS - Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anotherdayofmiracles.com

John C. Davis, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

annettedavidtranslations.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

theodandavid.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andydavisstoryteller.com

Andy Davis, Storyteller

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

3bearsstudio.com

Rachel Más Davidson

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

dlcainauthor.com

Home | David L. Cain, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bendablelight.com

Bendable Light - David Rodeback

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

matcallahan.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

billanddavescocktailhour.com

Bill and Dave's Cocktail Hour

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bluerosemag.com

Twin Peaks and David Lynch books, magazines and more

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Home | Roald Dahl

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

somepeoplepodcast.com

Some People with Alexa Davis | A Podcast for Curious Minds

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.