Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to robkumar.com

Rob Kumar's Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
arslanbekzhaparov.com
Arslan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
alexarraiza.dev
Alex's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
kumarashish.com
Ashish Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
nicoleplaneta.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
kyleblee.com
Kyle Lee - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
arnav-sethi.com
Arnav Sethi | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
asabizanjo.dev
Portfolio - Asa Bizanjo
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
mattsibson.com
Matt Sibson - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
donikachristova.com
Donika - My Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
abhixv.dev
Abhishek Sharma | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
nibardo.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alanagreenaway.dev
Alana Greenaway - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
piersrajguru.com
Piers Rajguru - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
fbence.com
Bence Farkas | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
abirstech.store
Abir's Tech | Practical Tools
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
nichedevstudios.com
Portfolio | NicheDev Studios
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
softwaretoaster.com
Paperfolio - Portfolio Landing Page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
krisjulio.dev
Kris - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.