Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to robkenis.dev

Notes by Rob Kenis · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
albertovazquez.dev
beto4812 notes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
clouddora.com
Salesforce development services by Clouddora
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mauriciopoppe.com
Mauricio Poppe notes | Mauricio Poppe
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
bencode.net
Benny Simmonds
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
lab4devops.com
DEVOPS | CLOUD | TOOLS
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
cloudscalr.com
GuilhemCastillo.com
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
robcortez.com
// RobCortez
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
fiatdesign.com
FiatDesign by Denis Shatilov
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
instantiatesolutions.com
Shaun Domingo - Distributed Reality
2 shared topicscloud-computing
62match
devopsdudes.co.uk 🇬🇧
Gibbsoft - DevOps by default
2 shared topicscloud-computing
62match
beyondthe.cloud
Beyond The Cloud
2 shared topicscloud-computing
62match
kubefed.com
metaCluster - Kubernetes at Scale
2 shared topicscloud-computing
62match
maxivanov.io
Blog by Max Ivanov
2 shared topicscloud-computing
62match
pino-labs.com
Pino Labs DEV Blog - Optimizely, Azure & .NET notes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
7nolikov.dev
7nolikov | Dmitrii Novikov
2 shared topicscloud-computing
62match
cloudcrushers.com
Thomas Preischl - Blog about Cloud Technology, new trends and cool geekstuff
2 shared topicscloud-computing
62match
gregorsuttie.com
Azure Greg - Passionate about all things Azure
2 shared topicscloud-computing
62match
robreagan.com
Rob Reagan
2 shared topicscloud-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.