Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to robinmanigrasso.com

Robin Manigrasso · Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
arthux.com
Arthux Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
nicodesign.io
Nico – Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
kumanan15.com
Kumanan - Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
maxabbey.com
Max Abbey / Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
roblafratta.com
Rob Lafratta Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
dmitryneko.com
Dmitry Neko | Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
kwchu.com
Kevin Chu – Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
matthewdea.com
Matthew Dea - Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
nickbraver.com
Nick Braver - Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
robezyumi.com
Roberta Yda - Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
roiesh.com
Roie Shalom · Product Design Lead
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
andysmith.io
Andy Smith • Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
djokicnenad.com
Nenad Djokic I PRODUCT DESIGNER
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
mattgirardi.com
Matt Girardi | Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
piskelin.com
Piske Lin | UX Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
alexvilensky.com
Alex Vilensky | Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
abhish3kjain.com
Abhishek Jain | Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
romamelnik.com
Roma Melnik — Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.