Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to robindg.com

Robin De Gernier · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
robinjade.com
Robin Jade
1 shared topicsscience
66match
robinscientific.com
robinscientific
1 shared topicsscience
65match
robinnguyen.com
Robin Nguyen, Behavioural Neuroscientist
1 shared topicsscience
64match
robinkazmier.com
Robin Kazmier | Science Journalist
1 shared topicsscience
64match
robinhenig.com
Robin Marantz Henig - JOURNALIST, AUTHOR, SCIENCE WRITER
1 shared topicsscience
62match
robiulhossen.com
Robiul Hossen
1 shared topicsscience
62match
disruptedscience.com
Home | Disrupted Science
1 shared topicsscience
62match
robinmazumder.com
Robin Mazumder – Neuroscientist. Writer. Speaker. Consultant
1 shared topicsscience
62match
nicolasnierenberg.com
Nicolas Nierenberg - Home
1 shared topicsscience
62match
robinpmooney.com
Robin P. Mooney, PhD – Data Scientist // Researcher // Project Manager
1 shared topicsscience
62match
solena-mednicoff.com
Solena D. Mednicoff
1 shared topicsscience
62match
thekittimprojection.com
The Kittim Projection – Teoría de unificación
1 shared topicsscience
62match
robertogdealmeida.com
Roberto G. de Almeida
1 shared topicsscience
62match
neurobiologyofplay.com
The Neurobiology of Play
1 shared topicsscience
62match
neutronnuggets.com
Neutron Nuggets - Where Science Gets a Little Nutty
1 shared topicsscience
61match
benjamindavidpeterson.com
Benjamin D. Peterson - Home
1 shared topicsscience
61match
afrifek.org
Afri-Fek - Plateforme de Recherche Africaine
1 shared topicsscience
61match
pietrodefinis.com
Pietro De Finis - Project Catalyst
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.