Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to robinbarefield.com

Author | Robin Barefield, Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
clivewardauthor.com
Author | Clive Ward Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
rmwild.com
Mystery Author | R.M. Wild
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
robinperks.com
Robin Perks | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
robinwells.com
Home - Robin Wells Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
arlosharp.com
Arlo Sharp, author - Arlo Sharp, author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
artburton.com
Author | Art T. Burton
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
rjjacobsauthor.com
R.J. Jacobs | Mystery Author | Mystery Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
arkennedyauthor.com
A R Kennedy Author | Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
robinreul.com
Robin Reul | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
robinpawlak.com
Robin Pawlak | Children's Author | Space Cadets
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
dlsletten.com
D. L. Sletten - Author - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ktcarlisle.com
Murder Mystery Indie Author | K.T. Carlisle
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
robinnolet.com
Robin P. Nolet - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
arlindixon.com
Arlin Dixon, Author - Home Page | Arlin Dixon, Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
cmhower.com
C.M. Hower, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
robertesaunders.com
Author Website for Robert E. Saunders | Robert E. Saunders, author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
dklament.com
Author | D.K. Lament
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
dlambertauthor.com
D. Lambert, author - Home
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.