Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to robertjanicki.com

Robert Janicki · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
robertlech.com
Robert Lech
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
arnorsson.com
Robert Arnorsson
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
intertects.com
Intertects - Software Engineering
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
benjaminmckinley.com
Benjamin McKinley
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
alejandropch.com
Alejandro Pachas
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
alexsh.me
Alex Hollander - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
a16n.dev
Alex Nicholson
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
benbrochtrup.dev
Ben Brochtrup
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
bhardwaj.dev
Shubham Bhardwaj | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
arman-karimi.com
Arman Karimi - Senior Software Engineer - Berlin
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
fatlyz.com
Yunzhu Li
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
kurounseung.com
KurounSeung | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
masiursiddiki.com
Masiur Rahman Siddiki - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
matteolobello.com
Matteo Lobello
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
meenakshimadhu.com
Meenakshi Madhu | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
alexforsyth.io
Alex Forsyth
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mattlaroche.com
Matt Laroche – Software Engineering Manager
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
artofsoftwareengineering.com
ART of SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.