Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to robertcina.com

Robert Cina Online · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
robert-campbell.com
Robert Campbell
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
robertwpearce.com
Robert Pearce
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
robertebonham.com
Robert Bonham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
robertstefanic.com
Robert Stefanic
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
phpserialize.com
PHP Serialize Online
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
phpunserialize.com
PHP Unserialize Online
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
robertpevec.com
Portfolio - Robert Pevec
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
gregfredabytes.com
GregFredaBytes — Systems online
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robertsrulesofcoders.com
Robert's Rules of Coders
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ben-robertson.com
Ben Robertson - Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robertlarsononline.com
Robert Larson - Software Engineering Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
binaryconvert.com
Online Binary-Decimal Converter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
krook.dev
Robert Krook - Haskell Developer in Gothenburg
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
albertxlynch.com
Albert Lynch Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
solutions2coding.com
Solutions2Coding - S2C- An online Platform for Coding solutions.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
clojure.dev
Mikko Vataja on Clojure
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
clojureblog.com
Mikko Vataja on Clojure
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
clojuredev.com
Mikko Vataja on Clojure
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.