similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to roaldnefs.com

Roald Nefs · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

binaryandbrew.com

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Farsilyez — Cybersecurity Intelligence Hub

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Kushal Chakraborty

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Ender Phan · Security Engineer

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

boardinghouz.com

Aaron J. Newton

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

cliffordrodriguez.com

Clifford Rodriguez | Portfolio

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Maximiliano Canellas | A personal page for sharing professional information and technical insights.

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

alex-ulmer.info

Alex Ulmer - Personal Homepage

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Home | HackinAhab

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

codebrewcyber.com

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

internetsimmortal.com

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home | Max Couling

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

beycanyildiz.com

Beycan Yıldız - Cyber Security Engineer

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

0xHabib - Cybersecurity Learning Journey

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.