Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rmgeorge.com

RMGeorge · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
bobdegeorge.com
Bob DeGeorge
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
fatesapology.com
Fate's Apology - by A.M. Geiger
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
blow2.com
Blow 2: The Sequel to George Jung's Story
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
andrewfleig.net
Andrew Fleig
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
andrewhunkins.com
Andrew Hunkins
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
blueboxaudiovisual.com
Bluebox and January Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
dlyssoday.com
The Tale of D'lyssoday, Book One - Fortress by Melynda Kiring
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
adiamond.me
Andrew Diamond
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
farafieldpress.com
To Lands Far Afield… – Home of Far Afield Press
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
andrewbest.net
Andrew Best
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
andrewwitt.org
Andrew Witt
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
andrewgretes.com
Andrew Gretes
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
andrewvoyce2.com
Andrew Voyce
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
ascrazyasitsounds.com
As Crazy As It Sounds – A Book in Progress
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
dmrasey.com
D.M. Rasey – I'm not a writer – I'm a storyteller
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
gretayorke.com
Greta Yorke Scotland – based children's author – Where imagination runs riot
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
krisfazekas.com
Kris Writes Worlds – Writing and everything amazing about it!
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
ktleeauthor.com
K.T. Lee – 📚 Author, engineer, big fan of science and happy endings 📚
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.