Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rmascitelli.com

Robert Mascitelli · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
rkengler.com
Robert Engler
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
robcarneydev.com
Robert Carney
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
robertheaton.com
Robert Heaton
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
robertbalicki.com
Robert Balicki
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
roberthargreaves.com
Robert Hargreaves
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
roberto-rodriguez.com
Roberto Rodriguez
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
roberm.com
Robertino Martinez
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
robertinomartinez.com
Robertino Martinez
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
robertinom.com
Robertino Martinez
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cameronroberts.uk 🇬🇧
Home | Cameron Roberts
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
robbattaglia.com
Robert Battaglia | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
robertogallea.com
Home - robertogallea.com
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robertvokac.com
Robert Vokáč | C++ Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
albertna.net
About Albert Na
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
albertchmilevski.com
Albert Chmilevski
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
robertoor.com
Roberto OR – Code and Life
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
intelligiblebabble.com
Intelligible Babble
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
robertsmetana.com
Robert Smetana – Team lead in software development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.