Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rjpat.com

RJ Patterson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
andrewbpeterson.dev
Andrew Peterson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ashish.me
Ashish Patel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
roadtodurka.com
Mattermost
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
softperson.com
Softperson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewlwatts.com
Andrew L Watts
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
matterforma.com
Matterforma
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
code-spotters.com
Home | Code Spotters
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
codecuboid.com
Code Cuboid
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
software-that-matters.com
Software That Matters
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
activematter.io
Active Matter
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrewcotter.io
andrew cotter
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
matterizelabs.com
Matterize Labs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
arseniyshestakov.com
Personal website · Arseniy Shestakov
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
billduncan.org
Performance Matters (and Other Tidbits from the Trenches)
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kristinmayo.com
Welcome | Kristin Mayo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
pipinoc.com
Personal Wiki -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abdullahrkw.com
My personal blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
birsak.net
Michael Birsak
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.