Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to rjamaka.com

rjamaka.com – ROSANNA AMAKA · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
dlsolum.com
DLSolum.com – D.L. Solum
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
nickdenardi.com
NickDeNardi.com – reading and writing.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
iolameyer.com
iolameyer.com – Writing in progress
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
cliffnotebooks.com
cliffnotebooks.com – Books In A Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
rochelleransom.com
Rochelle Ransom – author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
nicolapenfold.com
nicolapenfold.com – Children's writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
kristanaarp.com
Kristana Arp – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
1deverything.com
1dEverything – Roll for Reality.
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
nichefiction.com
NicheFiction.com – A Site Full of Niche Fiction
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
beyondthecalmland.com
Beyond The Calm – Series
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
djamilaibrahim.com
Djamila Ibrahim – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
belwoodsblog.com
Bel Woods – Reader|Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
djdavisauthor.com
DJ Davis – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
dlleeauthor.com
D.L. Lee – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
krupage.com
Krupa Ge – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
nfwebbbooks.com
N.F.Webb – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
dlhess.com
D.L. Hess – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
mckenzierosemont.com
McKenzie Rosemont – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.