Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to rickapps.com

Small programming projects - examples and info · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ringprogramming.com
Ring Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
riptutorial.com
Learn programming languages with books and examples
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
dlangprogramming.com
DLang Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
ocamlprogramming.com
OCaml Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
oatllo.com
Oatllo – programming blog, projects, courses, tips.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
jaiprogramming.com
Jai Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
koremis.dev
My Programming Notes - Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
annaprogramming.com
Anna Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
beefprogramming.com
Beef Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
kokaprogramming.com
Koka Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
mojolangprogramming.com
Mojo Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
mojoprogramming.com
Mojo Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
odinprogramming.com
Odin Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
ponyprogramming.com
Pony Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
poshprogramming.com
Posh Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
geek-coding.com
Programming Tutorials and Insights at Geek Coding
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
retroprogramming.com
Retro Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
octaveprogramming.com
Octave Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.