Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to richjeff.com

Richard Jeffords · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
alexrichards.dev
Alex Richards
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
melanie-richards.com
Melanie Richards
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
codebyjeff.com
codebyjeff - Jeff Madsen
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
mellocoding.com
Jeffrey Mello
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
fards.com
Fard Family
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
gruffygoat.com
Affordable Web Design & Development
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
codethem.com
CodeThem.com · Digital Agency Staffordshire UK
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
mazeebuild.com
MazeeBuild
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
techarmy.mx 🇲🇽
TechArmyMx
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
maynardwebdesign.com
maynard web design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
1000wordsjs.com
1000Words.js
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
1radwebsite.com
RAD Websites | Resourceful, Affordable, Dependable Web Design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
bluepooldigital.com
Web Design Bournemouth - Affordable - Fast - Secure
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
codeanddesigns.com
Affordable Web Design for Small Businesses | Code & Designs
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
thewebsewa.com
The Web Sewa | Affordable & Creative Web Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
ipropri.com
Affordable Websites for Entrepreneurs & Creators
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
coffeebeandigital.co.uk 🇬🇧
Affordable web services in South West London
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
roarmeow.com
Michael Kranz :
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.