Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to richardsapperdesign.com

Richard Sapper - Official website of industrial designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
susannahalene.com
Soos - Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
ivanlisi.com
Ivan Lisi | industrial designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
sharonraviv.com
Sharon Raviv, Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
6floral.com
Sky Cheng — Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
object-office.com
Object–Office | Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
ringelhan.com
Andreas Huber - Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
cameronholder.com
Cameron Holder • Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
shibilmani.com
Industrial & Graphic Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
henryjulier.com
Henry Julier Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
cademoon.com
Cade Moon Industrial Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
moimoimu.com
Moi Moi, Mu Kim – Industrial Designer and Design Strategist
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
gaurdesign.com
Gaur Design | Industrial Designer | Mumbai
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
anasarab.com
Anas Arab | Design Studio - Official Website & Gallery
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
gatoruserdesign.com
UF Gator User Design | Official Website
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
isolampidesign.com
OFFICIAL SITE OF ISOLAMPI DESIGN COLLECTIVE - Home
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
isisshiffer.com
Spitfire Industry - Industrial Design | New York
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
kolkmannen.com
Kolkmannen • Industrial Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
jacellc.com
Industrial Design | Product Innovation | JACE LLC
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.