Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to richardcore.com

RICHARDCORE · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
richardgu.com
Richard Gu
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
richardwen.com
Richard Wen
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
richardnias.com
Richard Nias
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
itisallaboutthedata.com
Richard Tatum
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
richard-le.com
Richard Le - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
richardxgao.com
Richard Gao | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
richardoduro.com
Richard Oduro - Computer Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
richardloricco.com
Richard LoRicco · Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dkrichards.com
dkrichards86 (Keith Richards) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
m2core.dev
M2Core
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
beepscore.com
Beepscore
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
eucscore.com
EUC Score
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
eucanalytics.com
EUC Score
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
hewncore.com
Hewn Core
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
appliscore.com
appliscore
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
richardfamoroti.com
Richard A. Famoroti | World-Class Startup Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
discore.app
Home | DisCore
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
richfromengineering.com
Rich Schupbach
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.