Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ricardof.dev

Ricardo Fuhrmann · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
ribalda.com
Ricardo Ribalda, PhD
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
62match
shellhound.com
Shellhound - Where code meets chaos (and clarity).
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
62match
bckinfo.com
bckinfo.com - Linux guidance based on practical experience
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
62match
revyrlabs.com
Revyr Labs | Linux-first Hardware Automation
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
61match
retrobsd.com
Home · RetroBSD/retrobsd Wiki · GitHub
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
61match
geanix.com
Geanix - Geanix
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
61match
bayareanixos.com
Bay Area Nix User Group
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
iydheko.dev
Ferdinan Iydheko
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
61match
distrosetta.com
Home | distrosetta.com
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
compilefailed.com
CompileFailed – Programming and stuff
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
garenkessel.com
Field Notes | Blog for all things Garen.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
spheresystems.co.uk 🇬🇧
Sphere Systems
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
distroseed.com
DistroSeed HomePage
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
dlnextend.com
Linux Out Loud
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
andrewkroh.com
Tech Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
andrealmeid.com
tony is coding
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
andytson.com
Andy Thompson
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
angadcheema.com
A N G A D
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.