Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to reynaud.dev

Filipe Reynaud — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
isaxcode.com
Mohammed Isa — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ethanloh.com
Ethan Loh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
cameronrz.dev
Cameron Ramirez — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
hekdev.com
Erik Kleiman — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
dirkdevelops.com
Dirk Knibbe — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
heyitsravi.com
Ravi Prakash — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
camipg.com
Camila Pozas — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
itstarik.com
Tarik Hammoumi — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andreafuso.dev
Andrea Fuso — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
calebberhane.com
Caleb B — Software Engineer & AI Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ricardosiebert.com
Ricardo Siebert — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
obinnachidi.com
Obinna Chidi — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
sharinin.com
Sharini Nirmalan — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
gedasga.com
GedasGa | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
surajd.com
Suraj Dudhatra — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
shirazamin.com
Shiraz Amin — Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
angelumeh.dev
Angel Umeh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
angelumeh.com
Angel Umeh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.