Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to revcd.com

Charlie Revett (@revcd) — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
dminhvu.com
Minh Vu — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
gaurangg.com
Gaurang Gujrati — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
hersitech.com
Hersi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
suzynakayama.com
Suzy Nakayama - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
hendrynug.com
Hendry Nugroho — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
sharvutpat.com
Sharv Utpat | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
moe-na.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
molinari.dev
Daniele Molinari — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
moeezsohail.com
Moeez Sohail — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rileyadair.com
Riley Adair — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andreiamza.dev
Portfolio — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
diyapatel42.com
Diya Patel — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
esbravo.dev
Erick Sanabria | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
bedirhangiden.com
Bedirhan Giden — Full Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
divyaroseraju.com
Divya Rose Raju — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
nzedimma.com
Clinton Nzedimma — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
divyanshusoni.com
Divyanshu Soni | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
gavinantonacci.com
Gavin Antonacci - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.