Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to returnondev.com

Return on Development · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
placelabdev.com
PLACELAB Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
resonant.dev
Resonant Development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
dogwaterdev.com
Dog Water Development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
dogwaterdevelopment.com
Dog Water Development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
computabledev.com
Computable Development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
piyonline.dev
PIY Online Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
containers.dev
Development containers
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
geldev.com
Gelatinous Development Studio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
aaronkyle.com
Aaron Kyle Design & Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
eswaran.dev
ESWARAN | Research & Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
lyxonn.com
Product development at any scale
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
aaronarney.dev
Aaron Arney · A development blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
dotwrk.com
Hire Development Team | .wrk | .wrk
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
gamibox.io
Gamibox Low-Code Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
moealali.com
Moe Alali - System Development Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
24hourapps.com
DevExpress - 24 Hour Development Company
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
etherwavelabs.com
Blockchain Development Agency - Etherwave Labs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
supercodebros.com
Full Stack Development - Super Code Bros
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.