Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to research-human.com

Research Human · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
essilen-research.com
Essilen Research
1 shared topicshuman-resources
70match
digitalworkresearch.com
Digital Work Research |
1 shared topicshuman-resources
70match
richardposthumare.com
Anonymous Research
1 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
andrewteodorescu.com
Research - Andrew Teodorescu
1 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
ivesearch.com
Ives Search
1 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
mondomentor.com
Mondo Search
1 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
pksahoo.com
Praneet Kumar Sahoo | Human Factors Researcher
1 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
candidresearch.com
Home Page | Candid Research
1 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
rightsearchuae.com
Right Search HR Consultancy
1 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
retainedsearchgroup.com
Retained Search Group
1 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
incomesdataresearch.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home | Incomes Data Research
1 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
directsearchalliance.com
Direct Search Alliance
1 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
a1humanwealth.com
A1 Human Wealth
1 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
callistosearch.com
Callisto Search
1 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
sharpresearchtalent.com
Home - Sharp Research & Talent Limited
1 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
shapedatabase.com
Recruiter Search
1 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
progressiohumano.com.br 🇧🇷
Progressio Humano
1 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
calderwoodsearchrecruit.com
Calderwood Search Partners
1 shared topicshuman-resources

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.