similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to repuva-group.com

Repuva Group alternatives & similar sites

Repuva Group – Online Reputation Management — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Marketing And Advertising →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nb-services.info ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	NB Services - Professionelles Online-Reputationsmanagement in Deutschland	de	marketing-and-advertising Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
vyremanagement.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	VYRE Management – OnlyFans & Creator Agentur	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ace-mgmt.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ACE Management	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reviewpush.ch ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ReviewPush – Google Bewertungen verwalten & Reputation steigern	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5rating.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	5rating \| Dein Online Partner	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bewertungsmanagement.ch ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Bewertungsmanagement Content Hub	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrea-claudia-delp.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	SEO \| Onlinemarketing \| IT-Management	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
adtidude.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ADtiDude Marketing Communication Lead Management	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
live-your-visions.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Live Your Visions – Marketingagentur \| Webdesign, KI-Marketing & Reputationsmanagement	Germany~ de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mybranding.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	mybranding.ch – Brand Management	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
of-management.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	of-management	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jp-meyer.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	JP Meyer – Online Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lmk-media.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	LMK Media - Social Media Management	de	marketing-and-advertising Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alexander-hollstein.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alexander Hollstein – Affiliate Management Experte & Online Marketing Berater \| Leipzig	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adpace.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ADPACE – Online Marketing Agentur	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexander-noack.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alexander Noack – Online Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jan-lies.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	PR-Management - Home	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amatixmedia.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AMATIX – Bewertungsmanagement & ORM	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.