Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to renasakata.com

Rena Sakata - Frontend Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
ethansnj.com
Ethan - Frontend developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
renrelio.dev
Amir Mamedov - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
bhuwanaryal.com
Bhuwan Aryal - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
pawelgnat.com
Paweł Gnat - Frontend developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andersonmalheiro.com
Anderson - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
nanakweku.dev
Nana Kweku August - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ahmedelbalal.dev
Ahmed Elbalal | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
adamrboyd.dev
Adam Boyd | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
animan.io
Animan Amit - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
renebitter.dev
Rene Bitter - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
annelee.net
Anne Lee | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ammarkashmiri.com
Ammar Sajid - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ihsaninh.com
Ihsan Nurul Habib - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
evanjenkinsdev.com
Evan Jenkins | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewpwatson.com
Andrew Watson - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
devkpf.com
Kim Fajardo | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ammartian.dev
Ammar Hakimi | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
skreslett.com
Einar Skreslett - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.