Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to relapsedreader.com

The Relapsed Reader | Sean | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
andrewmyrman.com
Andrew Myrman | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
coursonreads.com
Courson Reads | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
ecthewriter.com
EC's Double Entry | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
hithehazelnut.com
The Hazelnut | Walker Larson | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
oxforddawn.com
Oxford Dawn | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
animaveritas.org
Shoshana Abelman | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
holdingtheedge.com
Holding the Edge | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
abraransari.com
Abrar Ansari | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
theasteroidagenda.com
Ryan TAA | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
creativeadjacency.com
Creative Adjacency | Jacy Cochran | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
lookbooksnacc.com
Book Snacc | Alex Howe | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
terselore.com
terse lore | raj samuel | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
courtagonist.com
Courtny- Mostly Making It | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
recursiveanimal.com
Recursive Animal | Ash Jones | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
lostinthemetro.com
Maren’s Book Reviews & More | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
simisidhu.com
Simi Sidhu Writes: Between Worlds | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
textureoftomorrow.com
Texture Of Tomorrow | Agniva Mahata | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
3bookthursday.com
Three Book Thursday | Adam Rosh, MD | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.