Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to reidme.dev

REIDME · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
alejandrolaguna.dev
Alejandro Laguna
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
abu-ahmad.com
Motasem AbuAhmad
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewreed.org
How to Improve an NFA Constructed Lexical Analyzer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
multitasq.com
Justin McCandless · Justin McCandless
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
asthowen.com
Asthowen
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
luisciber.com
Sci Math && Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
silentbyte.com
SilentByte
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
burngames.net
Paul's Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
jsnhe.com
Jason He
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewpla.tech
Andrew Pla | My site where I talk about things. Stay in touch!
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
abdullahiusman.tech
Abdullahi Usman
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alexportland.com
Home | Alex Portland
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
adamreidelbach.com
Adam Reidelbach
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
tgratzer.com
Taylor Gratzer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
buddywilliams.dev
Buddy Williams - Projects and Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
atakanerbas.com
Atakan's Scratchpad
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
kaanpeksen.com
Kaan P. | Computer Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
efebolukbasi.com
Efe Bolukbasi | CS @ QueensU
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.