Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to regencyproofreading.com

Home - Regency Editorial Services · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
bryonyleah.com
Home | Bryony Leah Editorial | Romance Book Editing Services
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
recaptains.com
Home - Recaptains
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
andyjoneswriting.com
Editorial Writing / Andy Jones
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
reanolanmartin.com
Home - Rea Nolan Martin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
rebeccaarmitage.com
Home - Rebecca Armitage
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
towardanakedheart.com
Home - Rebecca S. Krantz
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
redbaumbooks.com
Home - redbaumbooks
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
redlotusreads.com
Home - Red Lotus Reads
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
longlovesediting.com
Long Loves Editing – Professional Editing Services for Romance Authors
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
abplum.com
Home - AB Plum
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
pamela-hart.com
Home - Pamela Hart
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
rebeccafieldwilson.com
Home - Rebecca Field Wilson
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
butchpop.com
Home - Butchpop
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
craigbezant.com
HOME | Craig Bezant Crime Fiction Author and Editor
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
furyswar.com
Home - Fury's War
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
lorafray.com
Home - Lora Fray
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
lorronco.com
Home - LorRonCo
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
muragon.io
Home - Muragon
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.