Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to regencyedit.com

Home - Regency Editorial Services · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
regencyeditor.com
Home - Regency Editorial Services
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
100match
regencyproofreading.com
Home - Regency Editorial Services
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
bryonyleah.com
Home | Bryony Leah Editorial | Romance Book Editing Services
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
danceleditorial.com
Dancel Editorial | freelance copy editor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
renaldo.com
Home - Renaldo
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
recaptains.com
Home - Recaptains
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
reanolanmartin.com
Home - Rea Nolan Martin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
remycorvin.com
Home - Remy Corvin
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
rebeccaarmitage.com
Home - Rebecca Armitage
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
revadavenport.com
Home - Reva Davenport
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
redbaumbooks.com
Home - redbaumbooks
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
redlotusreads.com
Home - Red Lotus Reads
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
relvingonzalez.com
Home - Relvin Gonzalez
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
reneeriva.com
Home - ReneeRiva.com
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
rileyvanderhoot.com
Home - Riley Vanderhoot
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
rjlocksley.com
RJ Locksley Editing
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
remwillis.com
Home - R.E.M Willis
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
reztipinterims.com
Home - reztipinterims.com
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.