Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to regelex.com

Regelex — EU legislation as an API · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
addrex.dev
Addrex — Batch Address Validation and Normalization
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
addrex.io
Addrex — Batch Address Validation and Normalization
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
eblaquery.com
EblaQuery — Premium Analytical Tools & Calculation Engines
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
test-app-builds.com
User Registration Form
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
regulatabase.com
Regulation Database
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
reldata.com
Real Education & Law
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
relationaldba.com
Relational DBA
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
acervo.org
Acervo: Item-level description at scale
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
4data.co.uk 🇬🇧
4data - database design, system integration and data extraction
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
btobconnection.com
B2B Connection — B2B databases, web scraping & data automation
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
loopdataservices.com
SIFWorks Data Integration — Managed by Loop Data
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
pagerdb.com
PagerDB — a toy relational database
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
relational-data.org
CTU Relational | Home
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
abhiwagge.com
Education
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
acinformation.com
AC Information and Research Services
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
ebscoalerts.com
EBSCO Information Services
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
ebscohost.com
EBSCO Information Services
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
btob.dev
Europe’s B2B Data Layer — btob.dev
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.