similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to referenssit.com

Referenssit alternatives & similar sites

Referenssit: Myyntikouluttaja Petri Fagerström — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Vocational Training →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
pigmentointikoulutus.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Kestopigmentoinnin Koulutukset 2026!	fi	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uusituuli.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Koulutuskalenteri - Osaamisloikka	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
9edu.info ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	9Lives Akatemia – Ensihoitajan koulutus	fi	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
piilaakso.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Digiosaamisen kehittämiseen - Piilaakso Academy	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
piilaaksoacademy.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Digiosaamisen kehittämiseen - Piilaakso Academy	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
piilaaksoakatemia.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Digiosaamisen kehittämiseen - Piilaakso Academy	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academyofbrain.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Academy of Brain \| Psykologiset työelämätaidot tutkimuspohjaisesti	fi	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boostsite.org ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Metsäalan itseopiskelumateriaalit - TTS	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
finskaterapihundskolan.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Finska Terapihundskolan – Kunskap – Nätverk – Kvalitet	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luentopalvelu.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Etusivu - Luentopalvelu Helena Pirttisalo	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
suomenhitsaus.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Suomenhitsaus – Suomen Hitsaushuolto, Hitsauskoevalvonta, WPS-hitsausojeet, hitsauskoordinointi	fi	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7heavenprofessionals.com ↗	24 match 1 shared topics	UV Ripsikoulutus \| 7 Heaven Professionals	fi	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uudenmaanakk.com ↗	24 match 1 shared topics	UAKK \| Ammattipätevyys- ja työturvallisuuskorttikoulutukset verkossa	fi	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fasciacopperbar.com ↗	23 match 1 shared topics	IASTM‑instrumentit ja faskiahoidon koulutukset \| Fascia Copper Bar	fi	vocational-training Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sahkot.com ↗	22 match 1 shared topics	Sähköalan koulutukset verkossa	fi	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
finn-tarkastus.com ↗	22 match 1 shared topics	Lakisääteiset tarkastuspalvelut - Koulutukset - FINN-Tarkastus Oy	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nerottaja.com ↗	22 match 1 shared topics	Nerottaja – Nerotuspalveluita asiantuntijoille	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luentokeskus.com ↗	21 match 1 shared topics	Etusivu — Luentokeskus Alexis	fi	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.